Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classroom action research enhanced reading comprehension and participation for fifth graders, suggesting CRH's effectiveness.
Background: Education is a key driver in shaping students’ knowledge and character, with Indonesian language literacy being crucial at the elementary level. Specific Background: Many fifth-grade students at SDN 224/II Sijau struggled with reading comprehension and failed to meet the Minimum Completion Criteria, showing low motivation and participation. Knowledge Gap: Although the Course Review Horey (CRH) model has been studied, few works explicitly examined its structured use in improving reading comprehension for low-participation students. Aims: This study aimed to describe how CRH could strengthen reading comprehension and participation in Indonesian language lessons. Results: Through two cycles of classroom action research, teacher performance improved (82.5% to 92.5%), student engagement increased (68.5% to 90.6%), and mastery learning rose from 62.5% to 94%. Novelty: The research applied CRH systematically across two action cycles, creating a lively, game-like, student-centered environment. Implications: Findings suggest CRH can be adopted widely to support literacy development and active participation in elementary language learning. Highlight: Students’ reading comprehension improved significantly after two CRH cycles Teachers became more skilled at managing interactive, student-centered lessons CRH fostered engagement, motivation, and better learning atmosphere Keywords: Course Review Horey, Reading Comprehension, Student Participation, Elementary Education, Classroom Action Research
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rara et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: