Observational analysis reveals co-infection does not affect recombination in endemic coronaviruses, indicating distinct evolutionary paths.
Knowledge gaps exist on whether SARS-CoV-2 co-infection alters recombination frequency or induces phylogenetic incongruities in endemic β-coronaviruses (HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1), limiting our understanding of cross-species evolution. Among 7213 COVID-19 and 1590 non-COVID-19 acute respiratory cases (2021–2022) screened via multiplex PCR, β-coronavirus co-infections (SARS-CoV-2 + HCoV-OC43/HKU1) and single HCoV-OC43/HKU1 infections were identified. Whole-genome sequencing (Illumina NovaSeq) was performed. Phylogenies were reconstructed using Bayesian inference (MrBayes). Recombination was assessed via Bootscan analysis (SimPlot). Co-infection prevalence was low (0.51%, mainly HCoV-HKU1: 0.28%, HCoV-OC43: 0.11%). HCoV-OC43 diverged into lineage 1 (genotype K) and a novel recombinant lineage 2 (genotypes F/J/G/I segments), exhibiting accelerated evolution. HCoV-HKU1 remained genetically stable (genotype B). Co-infection status did not influence evolutionary outcomes. While SARS-CoV-2 co-infection may favor transmission of endemic HCoVs, their evolution appears driven by population-level selection, not co-infection. HCoV-OC43 underwent recombination-driven diversification, contrasting sharply with HCoV-HKU1’s stasis, highlighting distinct evolutionary strategies. Integrated genomic and clinical surveillance is critical for tracking coronavirus adaptation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: