Cross-sectional analysis reveals AI literacy and pedagogical relevance influence teachers' behavioral intentions regarding generative AI use.
Purpose This study is aimed at explaining university teachers’ behavioral intentions to use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in their instruction, considering the effect of their AI literacy (AIL), organizational guidelines (OG), pedagogical relevance (PR) of GAI and their previous experiences (PE) with AI. Design/methodology/approach Using an online survey instrument, 493 university faculty members across Pakistan provided data for this cross-sectional quantitative study. Findings We found AIL, PR and OG as key factors that influenced teachers’ intentions to use GAI in their instruction. In addition, their prior experience of AI usage was found to be significant in predicting their intentions to use GAI. OG did not have a significant effect on the PR of AI. Originality/value The results suggest that universities should assist teachers in building their AI-related capacity. They can offer relevant professional development opportunities and on-the-job support. To ensure the relevant and meaningful use of GAI, they must also consider formulating OG. These guidelines must accommodate the pedagogical parameters, improve teachers’ pedagogical practices and overcome the negative consequences of AI for learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jogezai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: