Analysis demonstrates COVID-19 severity prediction using machine learning in 257 patients, highlighting key indicators.
For Machine Learning (ML) analysis, we utilized a dataset comprising 226 observations with 68 clinical, biochemical, and genetic features collected from 257 patients with confirmed COVID-19 (197 with moderate-to-severe disease and 60 with mild disease). The feature set included demographic variables (age, sex), genetic markers (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGB (rs1800790), NOS3 (rs2070744), and TMPRSS2 (rs12329760)), biochemical indicators (IL-6, endothelin-1, D-dimer, fibrinogen, among others), and clinical parameters (blood pressure, body mass index, comorbidities). The target variable was disease severity. To identify the most effective predictive models for COVID-19 severity, we systematically evaluated multiple supervised learning algorithms, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forest, gradient boosting, bagging, naïve Bayes, and support vector machines. Model performance was assessed using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Among the predictors, IL-6, presence of depression/pneumonia, LDL cholesterol, AST, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and ALT showed the strongest correlations with severity. The highest predictive accuracy, with negligible error rates, was achieved by ensemble-based models such as ExtraTreesClassifier, HistGradientBoostingClassifier, BaggingClassifier, and GradientBoostingClassifier. Notably, decision tree models demonstrated high classification precision at terminal nodes, many of which yielded a 100% probability for a specific severity class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sydorchuk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: