Multi-laboratory comparison reveals strong agreement in modified ribonucleoside quantification, highlighting need for standardized protocols.
The human RNome comprises all forms of RNA and the 50 + chemical structures—the epitranscriptome—that modify them. Understanding the diverse functions of RNA modifications in regulating gene expression and cell phenotype requires technologies such as RNA sequencing-based modification mapping and mass spectrometry-based quantification of modified ribonucleosides. Liquid chromatography-coupled tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) is the gold standard for detecting and quantifying modified ribonucleosides with accuracy and precision. However, variations in RNA isolation, processing, and LC–MS/MS analysis have hindered reproducibility across laboratories, which is essential for accurate quantification of RNA modifications. As guidance toward harmonization, we report a multi-laboratory comparison of workflows for LC–MS/MS RNA modification analysis. We compared protocols for sample shipment, RNA hydrolysis, LC–MS/MS analysis, and data processing among three laboratories working with the same total RNA samples. We detected and quantified 17 modifications consistently across protocols and operators, with another 7 that were sensitive to experimental conditions, reagent contamination, and ribonucleoside instability, leading to poor precision among laboratories. Agreement among the three labs was strong, with coefficients of variation of 20% and 10% for relative and absolute quantification, respectively. These findings establish a robust and readily adoptable epitranscriptome analytical platform that enables reliable comparisons across laboratories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hengesbach et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: