Natural experiment shows community-based liver disease detection affects hepatology referrals, suggesting potential benefits.
Objective To evaluate the impact of the Southampton Liver Pathway (SLP), a community-based liver disease detection programme, on hospital hepatology referrals. Method The SLP was implemented in Southampton City Clinical Commissioning Groups (SCCG) in January 2018. At-risk patients underwent enhanced liver fibrosis testing, with those scoring >9 referred for community-based FibroScan. Patients with liver stiffness >10 kPa were recommended for secondary care referral. A controlled interrupted time-series (CITS) design was used to compare monthly hepatology referral rates in SCCG before and after implementation with those in a control region (West Hampshire Clinical Commissioning Group, WHCCG) where no pathway existed. Potential system-level confounders were assessed by analysing trends in non-hepatology referrals and fibrosis testing volumes. Results Following implementation, 1654 new hepatology referrals were made from SCCG over 19 months (median 37/month, range 25–57), compared with 44/month pre-SLP (range 30–64). In WHCCG, referrals remained stable (median 28/month, range 20–41 pre-SLP, 14–34 post-SLP). CITS analysis showed a significant reduction in hepatology referrals in SCCG after the SLP was introduced compared with both the control region (incidence rate ratio, IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.98, p=0.001) and the preimplementation period (IRR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98, p<0.001). This reduction was not explained by system-level confounders: non-hepatology referrals increased and primary care fibrosis testing rose postimplementation. Conclusions The introduction of a structured primary care liver disease pathway was associated with a significant reduction in secondary care hepatology referrals. These findings suggest that such community-based pathways may alleviate hospital pressures, even as liver disease detection activity increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: