Prospective cohort study links cerebroplacental ratio to adverse perinatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancies, suggesting monitoring importance.
Objectives To assess the relationship of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) with non-reassuring/abnormal cardiotocography (CTG) tracing and perinatal outcomes like operative delivery, birth weight, NICU admission, meconium-stained liquor, and APGAR score in low-risk pregnancy. Methods This was a prospective cohort study at tertiary center in western India which included low risk singleton pregnancies between 35 and 37+6 weeks with cephalic presentation. Ultrasound was done between 35 and 37+6 weeks gestation including fetal biometry and Doppler for CPR calculation. Patients were divided into two groups, with normal CPR (>10th centile) and abnormal CPR (≤10th centile), and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results Out of 172 cases enrolled, CPR was abnormal in 55 (31.97 %) patients and normal in 117 (68.02 %) patients. In abnormal CPR group, CTG tracing was reassuring in 61.81 %, non-reassuring in 18.18 %, and abnormal in 20 %. While in normal CPR group, CTG tracing was reassuring in 81.19 %, non-reassuring in 11.11 %, and abnormal in 7.69 %. This was significant difference between the two groups (p=0.027). Cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates were comparable in both groups, (p value=0.63, 0.33). Lower birth weight was observed in 45.45 % of women in the abnormal CPR group, while 21.36 % of women had low birth weight in the normal CPR group (p value=0.006). No significant difference was found in APGAR score and NICU admissions between the two groups (p-value-0.94, 0.87). Conclusions We conclude that CPR measurement has good negative predictive value for fetal outcome in low risk pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rathore et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: