PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 19, 2025International Journal of Cancer2 citations

Real‐world effectiveness and safety of treatment strategies for unresectable, driver‐negative Stage III NSCLC: A retrospective multicentre study

View Full Paper
MXMingjun XuYXYan XuYMYingchun Man

Key Points

  • The study found weighted median progression-free survival reaching up to 25.8 months for certain treatment groups of NSCLC.
  • Overall survival was not reached for the (IO + CCRT/SCRT) → IO group, indicating potential effectiveness compared to alternatives.
  • The researchers utilized inverse probability treatment weighting to address baseline differences among diverse patient groups.
  • Findings may support early integration of immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy for better management of unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

Abstract

Abstract Concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy followed by immunotherapy (CCRT/SCRT→IO), known as the PACIFIC regimen, is the standard of care for unresectable, driver gene‐negative Stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in real‐world practice, some patients cannot proceed to immunotherapy due to toxicity, declining performance status, or disease progression. This multicenter retrospective study included 960 patients from 14 Chinese institutions (2011–2023) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alternative regimens. Patients were stratified into five groups. Primary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and immune‐related adverse events (irAEs). Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences. Among 911 evaluable patients, weighted median PFS was 21.7 months for (IO + CCRT/SCRT) → IO, 16.8 for (IO + Chemo) → IO, 25.8 for CCRT/SCRT → IO, 7.1 for chemotherapy alone, and 14.8 for CCRT/SCRT. Median OS was not reached in the (IO + CCRT/SCRT) → IO group and ranged from 31.1 to 58.3 months in others. No significant differences in PFS or OS were found between (IO + CCRT/SCRT) → IO and CCRT/SCRT → IO. Pneumonitis occurred most frequently in the CCRT/SCRT → IO group. Early initiation of IO did not significantly increase irAE risk. These findings support early integration of IO with chemoradiotherapy and maintenance IO as a viable option for unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d464f831b076d99fa64803https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Feasibility of induction chemoimmunotherapy (ID chemo-IO) followed by chemoradiation for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).2024
  2. 2Sequencing strategy of immunotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in stage III non–small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of prospective trials.2026
  3. 3Induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy and consolidation immunotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study2025 · 6 citations
  4. 4Multi-institution real world analysis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with standard of care (SOC) neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy (chemoIO).2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Sequential thoracic radiotherapy following immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective cohort study on efficacy and safety2026