Phytoplankton Sampling: When the Method Shapes the Message

Different sampling techniques were evaluated to assess potential differences in species richness and the abundances of phytoplankton across several lowland aquatic environments. Five sampling methods were used, including a bucket, narrow- and wide-mouth bottles, a 10 µm plankton net, and a vertical Van Dorn bottle. These sampling methods were applied in subtropical streams, shallow lakes, and rivers. The results were compared using a two-way ANOVA to evaluate differences in total density by considering the morphological group and major phytoplankton phyla. Similarity analyses (SIMPER) and a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were performed to compare the relative abundances of the species. The results showed, in general (except with Cyanophyta, Chrysophyta, and colonies—coenobia), significant differences in the effect of the sampling method but without interaction with the kind of environment. Particularly, the plankton net always reported lower density estimations, with the bucket having the highest values and the wide–narrow bottle methods having similar values. SIMPER and PERMANOVA indicated differences, especially with the plankton net and the other methods, particularly the bucket. These findings suggest that the sampling method can influence species counts and registration in subtropical water ecosystems, highlighting the need for standardized procedures across countries to obtain comparable and reliable results.