Retrospective comparison of single-incision and multi-port robotic cholecystectomy shows SIRC has longer operative times in patients, indicating safety and aesthetic advantages.
Introduction: Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy enhances precision and visualisation compared to traditional laparoscopy. This study compares single-incision robotic cholecystectomy (SIRC) with multi-port robotic cholecystectomy (MPRC) in elective settings. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study analysed 188 patients (63 SIRC, 125 MPRC) at a tertiary centre from 2018 to 2023, assessing operative time, length of stay (LOS) and complications. Results: SIRC had longer mean operative time (66 vs. 55 min, P < 0.001) and LOS (1.4 vs. 1.2 days, P = 0.02) than MPRC, with comparable wound infection (3.2% vs. 0.8%, P = 0.25) and hernia rates (1.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.33). Conclusion: SIRC is a safe, cosmetically appealing alternative to MPRC despite longer operative times, suitable for lower-body mass index patients prioritising aesthetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moaz Abulfaraj (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: