Retrospective analysis examines dermoscopic images for predicting invasive melanoma and BRAF status.
Background/Objectives: BRAF mutation is the most frequent somatic mutation in melanoma. The BRAF mutational status is crucial in selecting systemic therapy for advanced melanoma. Another important consideration is whether a melanoma is in situ or invasive. If this aspect could be known before the first surgical intervention, the appropriate surgical margins could be chosen from the beginning and a second surgical step could be avoided. Could the dermoscopic image predict the BRAF mutational status? Could it also predict if a melanoma is in situ or invasive? Methods: This retrospective study included 50 patients with 52 melanomas. The mutational status of the BRAF gene was determined, and the dermoscopic images were analysed. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the BRAF-mutant melanoma group and the BRAF wild-type melanoma group. However, there were statistically significant differences between the dermoscopic images of melanomas in situ and thin invasive melanomas (≤1 mm Breslow thickness). Irregular dots or globules (p = 0.008), a blue-white veil (p = 0.011), milky red areas (p = 0.008), dotted vessels (p = 0.04), and linear irregular vessels (p = 0.016) were all more frequently present in thin invasive melanomas compared to melanomas in situ. Conclusions: Dermoscopy could predict whether a melanoma is in situ or invasive, but it could not predict the mutational BRAF status in the present study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zboraș et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: