Cross-sectional study established normative values for ffERG, mfERG, PERG, and VEP in children, suggesting improved diagnostic accuracy.
Abstract Purpose: To set up age-stratified normative values for full‑field ERG (ffERG), multifocal ERG (mfERG), pattern ERG (PERG), and visual evoked potentials (VEP) in healthy children using ISCEV-standard protocols. Methods: Cross-sectional study on children aged 6 months–16 years. Ophthalmic examination and electrophysiological testing (ffERG, mfERG, PERG, VEP) performed per ISCEV standards. Responses analyzed for amplitude, latency, and age trends. Expected Results: Expect age-dependent increases in ERG/PERG amplitudes and reductions in VEP latencies, with maturation by adolescence. Significance: Provides comprehensive normative pediatric electrophysiology values to enhance diagnostic precision for retinal and optic nerve diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: