Evaluation of eRNA sampling methods for avian influenza viruses indicates asynchronous detections, highlighting current limitations.
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) viruses threaten humans, livestock and wildlife, highlighting the urgent need for early warning surveillance. Environmental RNA (eRNA) monitoring provides a safer, cost-effective and non-invasive alternative to direct pathogen testing, yet the effectiveness of different sample types for avian influenza viruses (AIVs) is unclear. We evaluated four eRNA-based sampling methods in urban waterfowl ponds over approximately one year. All methods combined with RT-qPCR and metagenomic sequencing detected AIV, but detections were asynchronous, likely reflecting low viral concentrations or detection limits. These results highlight both the promise and the current limitations of eRNA-based AIV surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: