Analysis reveals how neurocomputational models perform parsing and syntax, suggesting meaning can arise without syntactic computation.
ROSE is a rare example of a neurocomputational model of language that attempts, and partly manages, to align a formal theory of syntax and parsing with an oscillations-based 'neural code' that could implement the required operations. ROSE successfully reconciles hierarchical and predictive syntactic processing, but I argue that models of language in the brain should make room for the possibility that meaning may also be derived in the absence of any syntactic computation, be it hierarchical or predictive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giosuè Baggio (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: