Mixed-methods study finds low awareness of infertility treatment in women, highlighting barriers to care.
Introduction: Infertility is recognized as a global public health concern with life time prevalence of 17.5%. Infertility affects 60–80 million couples worldwide and about one fourth living in India. Knowledge about awareness, stigma, and socio-cultural beliefs attached with infertility in community set-up is very limited. Objectives: To investigate perceptions and challenges of women regarding awareness of infertility and fertility treatment. To identify their perceived needs facilitators and barriers in seeking treatment for infertility. To investigate socio-demographic characteristics of women influencing their awareness and perceptions concerning infertility. Methodology: Community-based, cross-sectional mixed-methods study conducted in Chandigarh during January to May 2025. Stratified two-stage random sampling was adopted. A total of 256 women aged 18–49 years were interviewed using semi-structured schedules. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed.Results: Among 256 respondents, 55.9% were aware of infertility treatment; however, only 32.8% knew it is treatable. Education and socioeconomic status were significantly associated with awareness (P<0.05). Private hospitals were the preferred facility (53.1%). High treatment cost (41.4%), lack of family support (34.0%), and fear of side effects (37.5%) were major barriers. Income showed significant association with cost as a barrier (P=0.028). Conclusion: Awareness of infertility treatment among women in Chandigarh remains suboptimal, with misconceptions and stigma prevalent. Barriers include affordability, limited public facilities, and family-related pressures. Affordable and accessible infertility services in public health settings and psychosocial interventions are urgently required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: