This analysis demonstrates the challenges in legal supervision of off-campus training under the double reduction policy, highlighting the need for a robust regulatory system.
Since the implementation of the “Double Reduction” policy in 2021, remarkable achievements have been made in the standardized management of off-campus training institutions in China. Law-based governance has become a key path to regulating the development of off-campus training institutions. However, at present, the legal supervision of off-campus training in our country still faces many difficulties. In specific governance, various difficulties in the legalized supervision of off-campus training can be overcome from four aspects: collaborative supervision between educational supervision and educational administrative law enforcement, establishing a “responsibility - interest - system” framework for the supervision and governance of off-campus training, improving the legal and regulatory system for off-campus training, and giving full play to the regulatory and guiding role of industry associations, to ensure the sound operation of off-campus training institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei Yuhan (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: