Observational study reveals that treatments for alopecia areata show limited long-term effectiveness in patients with significant scalp hair loss.
Background and Objective Limited evidence exists on prevailing treatments, disease characteristics, and real-world outcomes of patients with alopecia areata (AA), particularly for those with ≥50% scalp hair loss (SHL). This study sought to address this evidence gap. Methods This was a retrospective chart review study in the United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Germany. Adults and adolescents with ≥50% SHL were included. First clinical observation of ≥50% SHL defined the study index (2015-2019). Patients had ≥6 months of follow-up from index. Analyses were descriptive. The primary endpoint was absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, assessed longitudinally. Sustained SALT≤20, assessed via Kaplan-Meier, evaluated time to achieving SALT≤20 without regression to SALT>30 within 6 months. Results In total, 741 patients were included (median age at index: 27 years; 52.6% female). Mean (SD) SALT score at index was 63.5 (15.6); 80.2% had patchy AA and 19.8% had alopecia totalis or universalis. Topical corticosteroids were the most common treatment post-index, with 55.6% receiving ≥1 course with median cumulative exposure of 4 months. Systemic and intralesional corticosteroids (44.1% and 22.5%, respectively), systemic immunosuppressants (22.0%), and oral (17.3%) or topical (19.4%) minoxidil were also common. Mean (SD) absolute SALT reduction at 12 months post-index was -44.6% (37.3%). However, at 12 months, few patients (10.6%) achieved SALT≤20 that was sustained for ≥6 months. Conclusions Although patients in this study experienced substantial absolute SALT score reductions, few achieved and sustained SALT≤20. These findings highlight potential suboptimal effectiveness of the varied treatments applied in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: