Analysis of CHR-P subcategories shows similar outcomes in first-episode psychosis patients, suggesting critical insights for future research.
Background and Hypothesis Subcategories of the Clinical High-Risk state for psychosis (CHR-P) have been associated with differential risk for transition to first-episode psychosis (FEP), but their relevance for longer term FEP outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to determine the prevalence of 2 CHR-P subcategories — attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) and brief intermittent psychotic symptoms (BIPS) — in a full sample of FEP patients, along with their association with outcome trajectories following psychosis onset. Study Design Participants were recruited from an early intervention service and followed over 2 years, with repeated measures of psychotic symptoms, affective symptoms, and functioning. Pre-onset symptoms were assessed using follow-back methods to reconstruct subgroups and their prevalence within the sample. Linear mixed models were applied to examine associations between putative CHR-P subcategories and longitudinal outcomes. Study Results Of 319 patients, 240 (75.24%) experienced subthreshold psychotic symptoms indicative of a CHR-P state; of these, 51 (21.25%) had potential BIPS (either alone or with APS) and 189 (78.75%) potential APS only. There were no mean differences in scores for psychotic symptoms, affective symptoms, or functioning between subgroups. However, there was a slower improvement in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores in the putative APS subgroup, which converged with the putative BIPS subgroup by year 2. Conclusions Putative CHR-P subcategories of APS and BIPS exhibited similar outcome trajectories beyond psychosis onset, except for a possibly slower functional recovery in the putative APS subgroup. Longer term studies across stages of illness are needed to better understand the prognostic utility of these identifiers after FEP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Renaud‐Charest et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: