Experimental analysis explores gas migration and fluid loss in cement slurries, indicating enhanced performance with polymer treatment.
The majority of downhole monitoring methods currently available for well cement projects, which are used to assess the quality of cement placement and monitor well integrity over time, are primarily qualitative in nature and rely on surface signs. Obviously, there is a need for a practical quantitative downhole monitoring method to ensure proper cement placement and long-term performance. One potential resolution to address this enduring problem would involve enhancing the designs of the cement slurry and transforming the cement into durable downhole logging equipment, thereby facilitating real-time observation of operations. To address this issue, in this work, carboxylated styrene butadiene rubber (XSBR) polymer-treated cement was used to understand the gas migration and fluid loss mechanism. The experimental findings indicate that the electrical resistivity of polymer-treated cement is significantly influenced by applied loads and stresses. The unconfined compressive strength test with XSBR-blended cement showed a significant improvement from 22.5 MPa to 33.31 MPa when XSBR increased from 0% to 3%. Additionally, in the high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) chamber, the latex polymer used as a migration additive control, the total fluid loss is found to be about 59.2 mL under 30 min of testing. Also, to emulate the accuracy, nonlinear predictive models based on the resistivity index correlation were developed to forecast polymer-treated cement performance for all the tests performed in this study. Hence, the utilization of polymer-treated cement systems proves to be a valuable method for monitoring the placement and post-placement performance of cement, as well as for visualizing real-time operational issues associated with cementing. This will also allow operators to provide immediate solutions, saving time and operational costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: