This research develops a probabilistic ANN model for assessing liquefaction potential, highlighting improved accuracy and adaptability over traditional methods.
Constructing a probabilistic assessment method is the primary task and key step in liquefaction research. This paper presents a systematic investigation into liquefaction potential evaluation methods. Through a comparative analysis of three conventional assessment methods, we identify critical limitations in existing approaches regarding accuracy and adaptability. A probabilistic ANN model was developed using field-collected standard penetration test (SPT) data from 311 liquefaction case histories. The model demonstrates superior performance with an overall accuracy of 86.17%, achieving 83.33% and 90.00% recognition rates for liquefied and non-liquefied cases, respectively. Key metrics, including precision (91.84%), recall (83.33%), and F1-score (87.38%), indicate robust discriminative capability. Comparative studies confirm the ANN model’s advantages over traditional methods in terms of prediction reliability and operational practicality. The research outcomes offer significant value for improving current liquefaction hazard assessment protocols in geotechnical engineering practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: