PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025Energies19 citationsOpen Access

Benchmarking Transformer Variants for Hour-Ahead PV Forecasting: PatchTST with Adaptive Conformal Inference

View Full Paper
VSVishnu SureshWrocław University of Science and Technology

Key Points

  • PatchTST achieves superior accuracy with a mean absolute error of 0.194 kW compared to other models.
  • The results suggest a promising approach for hour-ahead PV forecasting while maintaining uncertainty quantification.
  • The framework utilizes adaptive conformal inference to provide reliable, real-time uncertainty estimations for forecasts.
  • Using a dataset derived from five years of rooftop PV data, results indicate significant potential for renewable energy integration.

Abstract

Accurate hour-ahead photovoltaic (PV) forecasts are essential for grid balancing, intraday trading, and renewable integration. While Transformer architectures have recently reshaped time series forecasting, their application to short-term PV prediction with calibrated uncertainty remains largely unexplored. This study provides a systematic benchmark of five Transformer variants (Autoformer, Informer, FEDformer, DLinear, and PatchTST) evaluated on a five-year, rooftop PV dataset (5 kW peak) against an unseen 12-month test set. All models are trained within a pipeline using a 48-h rolling input window with cyclical temporal encodings to ensure comparability. Beyond point forecasts, we introduce Adaptive Conformal Inference (ACI), a distribution-free and adaptive framework, to quantify uncertainty in real time. The results demonstrate that PatchTST, through its patch-based temporal tokenization, delivers superior accuracy (MAE = 0.194 kW, RMSE = 0.381 kW), outperforming both classical persistence and other Transformer baselines. When coupled with ACI, PatchTST achieves 86.2% empirical coverage with narrow intervals (0.62 kW mean width) and probabilistic scores (CRPS = 0.54; Winkler = 1.86) that strike a balance between sharpness and reliability. The findings establish that combining patch-based Transformers with adaptive conformal calibration provides a novel and viable route to risk-aware PV forecasting.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vishnu Suresh (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d469c131b076d99fa663a1https://doi.org/10.3390/en18185000
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electricity Load Forecasting Method Based on the GRA-FEDformer Algorithm2025 · 7 citations
  2. 2Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecasting2021 · 6,902 citations
  3. 3Time-Series Power Forecasting for Wind and Solar Energy Based on the SL-Transformer2023 · 30 citations
  4. 4A New Wind Speed Evaluation Method Based on Pinball Loss and Winkler Score2022 · 4 citations
  5. 5Photovoltaic Power Forecasting with Weather Conditioned Attention Mechanism2025 · 12 citations