Experimental design optimizes PCRBIO/DIG-ELISA sensitivity for diagnosing bovine tuberculosis, suggesting improved herd control.
Abstract Bovine Tuberculosis (BTb) is an important zoonosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis). In Argentina, the Official National Control Program mandates cattle slaughter when a positive Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) is observed. Herds that test negative twice a year are considered infection-free; however, unfortunately, many false negatives have been observed in anergic cattle. In our previous study, 16% of herds with TST-positive animals were found to be negative by the Polymerase Chain Reaction Touch-Down Insertion Sequence (PCRTD-IS6110) for detecting M. bovis in dairy milk. To optimise this diagnostic approach, a PCRBIO/DIG (Biotin/Digoxigenin)-ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) was developed using primers labelled with digoxigenin and biotin and detecting the amplified DNA by ELISA. The experimental parameters were optimised through statistical experimental design. The cut-off and the diagnostic and analytical characteristics were determined, considering results from both PCR and TST. Ultimately, DNA from 25 milk samples and 16 bovine tissue samples were analysed. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 66%, respectively. The analytical sensitivity of the PCRBIO/DIG-ELISA was 25 times higher than that of the PCRTD-IS6110; however, 16 negative milk samples by PCRTD-IS6110 were positive by PCRBIO/DIG-ELISA, 9 TST-negative. Therefore, PCRBIO/DIG-ELISA can be proposed as a useful tool for identifying infected herds, especially those with TST-negative animals, as they pose a risk for epidemiological control. Additionally, it could help confirm infection in slaughtered cattle with TST-negative results by analysing tissues with or without lesions compatible with BTb. It is the first to publish a PCRBIO/DIG-ELISA for the M. bovis detection in raw milk and tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabiano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: