Research evaluates redox behavior and electronic structure of silylamido complexes, revealing key insights.
We report the synthesis and characterization of pseudo-tetrahedral f-element complexes bearing the sterically demanding bidentate di(silylamido)silane ligand, {Me2Si(NSiiPr3)2}2– (Me2SiN†N†). Two equivalents of the dipotassium salt, [Me2SiN†N†K2] (1), react with either MIIII3(THF)n (M = Ce, Pr, n = 4; M = Tb, n = 3.5) or [UIV(BH4)4]n affording trivalent [MIII(Me2SiN†N†)2{K(η6-toluene)2}]n (2M; M = Ce, Pr, Tb) and tetravalent [UIV(Me2SiN†N†)2] (3U) respectively. Complex 2Ce was oxidized to tetravalent [CeIV(Me2SiN†N†)2] (3Ce) with AgI, but 2Pr and 2Tb were unreactive under these conditions. The electrochemical accessibility of M(IV/III) couples in 2M (M = Ce, Pr, Tb), and 3M (M = Ce, U) were examined by cyclic voltammetry. For 2Ce and 3Ce, a quasi-reversible Ce(IV/III) couple was observed (Epc = –1.19 V vs [Fc]+/0), but complexes 2Pr and 2Tb showed anodic waves attributed to ligand oxidation only – which is supported by computational analyses. For complex 3U, U(IV/III), U(V/IV), and U(VI/V) redox couples with E1/2 of –2.38, –0.89, and –0.11 V vs [Fc]+/0 respectively were found. All complexes have been characterized variously by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, multinuclear NMR, UV-Vis-NIR, and IR spectroscopies, SQUID magnetometry, and elemental analyses as appropriate. Electronic structure calculations have been employed to rationalize electrochemical results for 2Pr, 2Tb, and 3Ce.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Réant et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: