Correlational survey analysis reveals self-efficacy and motivation significantly influence mathematics achievement in pre-service teachers in Ghana.
This study investigated the extent to which cognitive and non-cognitive factors predict mathematics achievement among pre-service teachers in Colleges of Education (CoEs) in Ghana. Grounded in Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the study employed a correlational survey design to explore how personal, behavioural, and environmental factors interact to influence mathematics achievement. A sample of 498 pre-service teachers from various levels and specializations was selected using a convenience sampling approach. Data were collected through a structured Mathematics Achievement Questionnaire (MAQ), designed to measure cognitive factors (e.g., problem-solving, prior knowledge) and non-cognitive factors (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety). The reliability of the instrument was confirmed through a pilot study (α = 0.76), and data were analysed using multiple regression techniques. Findings revealed that both cognitive and non-cognitive factors significantly predicted mathematics achievement (R² = 0.814), with self-efficacy and problem-solving skills emerging as the strongest predictors. Notably, non-cognitive variables such as motivation and anxiety had a comparable or even greater influence on achievement than some cognitive dimensions. These results suggest that both domains play a critical and complementary role in shaping pre-service teachers’ performance in mathematics. The study concludes that a holistic approach, targeting both cognitive and non-cognitive development, is essential for improving mathematics achievement among pre-service teachers. Further studies are recommended to explore these dynamics in different contexts using actual academic records rather than self-reported achievement. The implications of this study on learning and teaching practices in CoEs are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mensah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: