Assessment of sensitivity and specificity for CT and GC detection from oropharyngeal and anorectal specimens, indicating diagnostic accuracy.
Background Extragenital (oropharyngeal and anorectal) Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (or gonococci [GC]) infections are underdiagnosed. Here we report sensitivity and specificity estimates that were obtained from the multiplex, PCR-based BD CTGCTV2 (CTGCTV2) assay, which simultaneously detects CT and GC from extragenital specimens on the high-throughput BD COR™ (COR) system. Methods Testing on the index assay utilized remnant (collected during a predicate, registrational trial) oropharyngeal (n = 2,318) or anorectal (n = 2,292) specimens, stored in PreservCyt ThinPrep liquid-based cytology media, from sexually active individuals (≥15 years of age). A composite comparator algorithm (CCA) was utilized to define infectious status in the predicate study, which consisted of a two out of three agreement from FDA-cleared CT/GC molecular assays for a reference-positive or -negative result. Results obtained from the CT/GC assay on the COR were compared to the predefined CCA. Results Testing for CT on COR had an estimated sensitivity of 100% [95% CI: 86.2, 100] and 97.7% [93.5, 99.2] from oropharyngeal and anorectal specimens, respectively. GC testing on COR resulted in sensitivity estimates of 92.8% [85.8, 96.5] and 95.8% [89.7, 98.4] from oropharyngeal and anorectal specimens, respectively. Specificity estimates for CT were 99.8% [99.5, 99.9] and 99.4% [99.0, 99.7], respectively. For GC, specificity estimates were 99.5% [99.1, 99.7] and 99.8% [99.5, 99.9] for oropharyngeal and anorectal specimens, respectively. Conclusions CTGCTV2 performance on COR was accurate when testing oropharyngeal and anorectal specimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pol et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: