This article explores 360-degree video-ethnography's unique affordances and limitations in qualitative inquiries, suggesting insights for community resilience studies.
This article investigates the evolving methodology of 360-degree video-ethnography, particularly in qualitative inquiries concerning the interconnectedness of individuals and their surroundings. It delineates some unique affordances of 360-degree videos in capturing multimodal elements and interpreting environments within place-centric research frameworks. Drawing from empirical observations and related literature, the authors explore key aspects of serendipity, unobtrusiveness and engagement that are facilitated by 360-degree video and VR headmounted displays (VR-HMD). Employing the ‘Rebuilding a Sense of Place (REPLACE)’ research project as a case study, this work elucidates some methodological and practical complexities of employing 360-degree video-ethnography to investigate community resilience post-natural disasters in Italy. The article concludes by advocating for continued inquiry into the dynamic landscape of 360-degree video-ethnography, emphasizing its evolving role in knowledge production and representation of space and place heritage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baraldo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: