Quantifies sars-cov-2 susceptibility to far-uvc in human saliva, suggesting effective disinfection methods.
Far-ultraviolet-C (far-UVC) irradiation has emerged as a breakthrough disinfection technology for the treatment of indoor air. Far-UVC wavelengths (222 nm) from filtered krypton-chloride excimer lamps are effective at inactivating airborne viruses and are safe for human exposure, thus enabling the continuous treatment of bulk air in occupied settings. This study quantifies the susceptibility of airborne SARS-CoV-2, aerosolized in human saliva, to far-UVC radiation. We measured fluence rate-based Z-value susceptibility constants (±standard error) of 4.4 ± 0.6 and 6.8 ± 0.7 cm2 mJ–1 for airborne SARS-CoV-2 under 40% and 65% relative humidity (RH) levels, respectively. At modeled far-UVC irradiation levels corresponding to 25% of the maximum safe human exposure limit, the resulting far-UVC equivalent air changes per hour (eACH) exceeded 62 h–1 at 65% RH and were significantly greater than the corresponding airborne SARS-CoV-2 natural decay rate (±standard error) of 5.4 ± 1.1 h–1, measured in the absence of far-UVC. These results define first-order loss rates for airborne SARS-CoV-2 under far-UVC exposure and support quantitative risk assessments and rational disinfection system implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: