This analysis reveals cross-linguistic and cross-modal differences in the interactive use of palm-up in ASL and LSFB, highlighting its role in conversational dynamics.
This study dives into the interactive functions of the palm-up across four language ecologies drawing on comparable corpus data from American Sign Language (ASL)-American English and French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB)-Belgian French. While researchers have examined palm-up in many different spoken and signed language contexts, they have primarily focused on the canonical forms and its epistemic variants. Work that directly compares palm-up across modalities and language ecologies remains scarce. This study addresses such gaps by documenting all instances of the palm approaching supination in four language ecologies to analyze its interactive functions cross-linguistically and cross-modally. Capitalizing on an existing typology of interactive gestures, palm-up annotations were conducted using ELAN on a total sample of 48 participants interacting face-to-face in dyads. Findings highlight the multifunctional nature of palm-up in terms of conversational dynamics with cross-modal differences in the specific interactive use of palm-up between spoken and signed language contexts. These findings underscore the versatility of the palm-up and reinforce its role in conversational dynamics as not merely supplementary but integral to human interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lepeut et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: