Analysis of gas explosions shows significant pipeline damage in utility tunnels, suggesting design improvements.
For the possible damage to overhead pipelines caused by gas explosions in utility tunnels, an overall three-dimensional finite-element model of utility tunnel–soil–pipeline is established, the overpressure loads are applied to the inner wall of the gas chamber in the utility tunnel, the dynamic response laws of the utility tunnel and the pipeline are calculated and analyzed, and anti-explosion protection measures are proposed. The results show that the degree of damage to the pipe wall is determined by both the explosion-impacted area and the soil constraint. Under the same explosion-impacted area, the peak horizontal displacement of the monitoring point without soil constraint is 1.64 times that with soil constraint, and 1.29 times for the peak vertical displacement. The damage to the lower part of the pipeline is significantly greater than that to the upper part of the pipeline, and the damage to the pipeline decreases with an increase in the horizontal angle between the utility tunnel and the pipeline. The diameter deformation rates were 49% at α = 0° and 84% at α = 45°, with α = 90° showing the least damage. Therefore, it is suggested that the overhead pipeline is perpendicular to the utility tunnel. As the vertical distance between the utility tunnel and the pipeline increases, the diameter deformation rate and displacement of the pipeline both decrease, and when this distance is greater than 3 m, the influence on the pipeline significantly decreases. Therefore, it is recommended that the distance between the pipeline and the utility tunnel should be at least 3 m. In addition, the damage caused by gas explosions to the overhead pipeline can be reduced by reinforcing the gas chamber, using energy-absorbing materials around the utility tunnel, and setting up hollow piles between the utility tunnel and pipelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: