Findings show core committees exist for committee sizes up to 8, indicating stability in voter representation.
In an approval-based committee election, the goal is to select a committee consisting of k out of m candidates, based on n voters who each approve an arbitrary number of the candidates. The core of such an election consists of all committees that satisfy a certain stability property which implies proportional representation. In particular, committees in the core cannot be "objected to" by a coalition of voters who is underrepresented. The notion of the core was proposed in 2016, but it has remained an open problem whether it is always non-empty. We prove that core committees always exist when k ≤ 8, for any number of candidates m and any number of voters n, by showing that the Proportional Approval Voting (PAV) rule, proposed by Thiele in 1895, always satisfies the core when k ≤ 7 and always selects at least one committee in the core when k = 8. We also develop an artificial rule based on recursive application of PAV, and use it to show that the core is non-empty whenever there are m ≤ 15 candidates, for any committee size k ≤ m and any number of voters n. These results are obtained with the help of computer search using linear programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dominik Peters (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: