Pilot trial demonstrates high acceptability and reduces pain and fear in fibromyalgia patients, suggesting potential in telehealth.
Background Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common, disabling, and costly nociplastic pain condition. Most frontline treatments show modest effects in reducing pain in FM, which may be due to a mismatch between the mechanisms of existing interventions and mechanisms underlying nociplastic pain. The current study was a single-arm, open-label trial examining the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel, three-session telehealth behavioral intervention (Brief Pain Reprocessing Therapy (BPRT)). BPRT incorporates psychological techniques specifically targeting the putative mechanisms of nociplastic pain in a brief, telehealth format. Methods 35 adults with FM initiated treatment. Participants were asked to complete three one-on-one intervention sessions via telehealth and online questionnaires at four time points (pre-intervention and at 1, 2, and 3 months post-intervention) assessing average pain intensity, pain interference, and pain-related fear. Results 33 participants (94.3%) completed the BPRT protocol. Acceptability ratings for BPRT were high (62.0 out of 70 on the Treatment Acceptability/Adherence Scale). BPRT completers reported significant reductions in average pain intensity (B=−0.645, 95% CI −0.896 to −0.395, p<0.001; 1-month d=0.56, 2-month d=0.80, 3-month d=0.89), pain interference (B=−2.19, 95% CI −3.06 to −1.31, p<0.001; 1-month d=0.76, 2-month d=1.02, 3-month d=1.06), and pain-related fear (B=−2.29, 95% CI −3.07 to −1.51, p<0.001; 1-month d=0.60, 2-month d=0.88, 3-month d=1.04). At the 3-month follow-up, 42.3% of completers reported being ‘much improved’ or ‘very much improved.’ Conclusions BPRT is feasible and acceptable, with promising preliminary efficacy for reducing pain, pain interference, and pain-related fear in FM. These findings highlight the possibility of reducing FM pain and interference using a brief telehealth intervention. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to rigorously evaluate the efficacy and mechanisms of BPRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sturgeon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: