Field experiment demonstrates that potassium fertilizer reduction and polyaspartic acid optimize yield and quality in tobacco, indicating potential environmental benefits.
Introduction The extensive application of potassium (K) in tobacco has exacerbated the shortage of K mineral resources in China. Polyaspartic acid (PASP) had shown significant effects in promoting the absorption of K, increasing the utilization rate of K fertilizer, and improving yield and quality of tobacco. Methods To clarify the potential and mechanism of PASP replacing some K fertilizers in tobacco production, field experiment was conducted with 4 different treatments: NK (traditional fertilization); RT (10% reduction of K fertilizer); NKP (traditional fertilization +4% PASP/total K 2 O); RKP (10% reduction of K fertilizer +4% PASP/total K 2 O). Results The reduction of K inhibited leaf growth, yield formation, K absorption, improved stem rate and decreased thickness, tensile strength, elongation rate and leaf surface density of flue-cured leaves, while had no effect on N, P, Cl content and rate of total sugar and nicotine. Comparing to NK, NKP raised the total yield by 16.7%, promoted physical properties and chemical quality optimization of flue-cured leaves. What is more, RKP compensated for the decrease in leaf yield, K content, processing utilization rate and sugar/nicotine of different parts caused by K reduction. However, K reduction and PASP application obviously influenced metabolite composition of rhizosphere soil without affecting the microbial community composition, and our results showed a relatively high correlation between differential metabolites and yield, K content, sugar/nicotine ratio, elongation rate of flue-cured tobacco. Conclusion Overall, PASP provided better optimization effects on tobacco growth, yield, physical properties, chemical quality of flue-cured leaves, and PASP was beneficial for replacing K fertilizer to a certain extent, reducing the consumption of K mineral resources and environmental pollution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: