Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 20, 2025World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Systematic review: Cutaneous flaps

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RORoberto Heliodoro Sanabia Orejel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Systematic review assesses clinical outcomes and complications of cutaneous flaps in reconstructive surgery, highlighting their importance.

Key Points

  • Local flaps demonstrated high survival rates with minimal complications, making them a reliable choice.
  • Free flaps are preferred for large defects, though they carry a higher risk of complications like partial necrosis.
  • Proper selection of flap type can optimize both functional and aesthetic outcomes in surgery.
  • Further high-quality trials are needed to standardize the indications for various flap techniques.

Cite This Study

Roberto Heliodoro Sanabia Orejel (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46aae31b076d99fa67788https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0821
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Facial Flaps in Plastic Surgery: A Concise Review of Types, Indications, and Outcomes2026
  2. 2Facial Flaps in Plastic Surgery: A Concise Review of Types, Indications, and Outcomes2026
  3. 3Comparative effectiveness of microsurgical versus local flaps for reconstructing extensive skin defects from advanced melanoma: a systematic review2025
  4. 4Perforator flaps in soft tissue reconstruction: clinical outcomes in reconstructive plastic surgery2025
  5. 5Perforator-based local flaps for cutaneous facial reconstruction2024 · 5 citations