Whole-exome sequencing reveals two FSIP2 mutations causing male infertility, suggesting genetic counseling implications.
Infertility is a global concern, and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) is the most severe form of male infertility, characterized by reduced sperm count, decreased motility, and increased abnormal morphology. Multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) characterize the most severe type of OAT and are usually caused by loss-of-function mutations in the genes essential for vital aspects of sperm biology, including concentration, motility, and morphology. The fibrous sheath interacting protein 2 (FSIP2) plays an essential role in sperm flagellar structure and function by regulating such processes as intraflagellar transport and acrosome formation. The present study, employing whole-exome sequencing (WES), identified two FSIP2 mutations in one patient (patient 1), a homozygous missense (c.262C>A, p.P88T) and a homozygous frameshift mutation (c.10948_10951del, p.N3653Nfs*22), as well as a homozygous FSIP2 frameshift mutation (c.15982_15982del, p.I5328Lfs*33) in another patient (patient 2). The results of bioinformatics analysis indicate that the identified missense mutation (c.262C>A) is rare and predicted to have a deleterious effect on FSIP2. Transmission electron microscopy analysis of sperm revealed several abnormalities, including a disorganized mitochondrial sheath, absence of the central pair and some doublets of microtubules, and significant dysplasia of the fibrous sheath. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) indicated significantly reduced FSIP2 messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in sperm lysate of the affected individuals. Immunofluorescence staining revealed a complete absence of FSIP2, A-kinase anchor protein 4 (AKAP4), sperm-associated antigen 6 (SPAG6), intraflagellar transport 20 (IFT20) and actin-like 7A (ACTL7A) proteins in the spermatozoa of patients. Thus, the novel FSIP2 variants identified in patient 1 and patient 2 are recognized as pathogenic mutations responsible for MMAF, providing valuable insights for genetic counseling and reproductive decision-making in affected males.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussain et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: