Genetic and structural analyses reveal bacA's function in importing ncr peptides in sinorhizobium meliloti, suggesting evolutionary significance.
Some legumes encode families of NCR (Nodule-Cysteine-Rich) peptides that cause their rhizobial partners to terminally differentiate during the development of a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Sinorhizobium meliloti, whose plant hosts Medicago truncatula and M. sativa express ca. 600 NCR peptides during root nodule development, possesses a symbiotically essential BacASm protein that imports certain NCR peptides into the cytoplasm. This import permits proteolytic degradation of the NCR peptides, thereby protecting the endocytosed bacteria from their antimicrobial peptide-like lethality, while also allowing certain NCR peptides to undergo their symbiotically critical interactions with cytoplasmic components, for example heme-sequestration in the case of NCR247. BacA's Escherichia coli ortholog SbmAEc can restore a wildtype phenotype to a ΔbacASm mutant. Our study employed 54 S. meliloti bacASm missense mutants (35 to cysteine and 19 to glycine) that we tested for protein production, ability to establish a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, and their susceptibility to killing by higher levels of the NCR247 and the Bac7(1-35) peptides. We also used the Single Cysteine Accessibility Method to make topological inferences. Our detailed genetic, biochemical, structural, and physiological analyses have revealed that BacASm and SbmA homodimers function as finely tuned import machines, whose structures can be relatively easily disrupted by single amino acid changes. Our discovery that several mutations that differentially separate nitrogen-fixation, NCR247 import, and Bac7(1-35) import map to the lining of the peptide-binding cavity in the outward-open SbmA/BacA conformation suggests a molecular explanation the other otherwise paradoxical observation that SbmA/BacAs from pathogens can fully replace BacASm, whereas BacAs from other rhizobia cannot.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: