The transition metal‐mediated activation of element–hydrogen bonds is an important goal for the preparation of commodity chemical compounds and novel materials. Here a facile route to the activation of germanium‐hydrogen bonds, based on the spontaneous elimination of dihydrogen, is reported. This represents a mechanistic divergence from the established methods for Ge─H bond cleavage. The novel complexes [Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(OTf)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] and [{Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(dppe)} 2 (μ‐N 2 )]OTf 2 are central to the success of this route. These crystalline species may be prepared in high yield and are highly effective sources of the 16‐electron [Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(P) 2 ] + fragment. Both complexes react with GeH 2 Ph 2 to eliminate H 2 and afford [Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(GePh 2 OTf)(P) 2 ] [(P) 2 = 2 PPh 3 , dppe], which is best described as a triflate‐stabilized metallogermylenium complex. Different species are observed on initial treatment of [Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(OTf)(PPh 3 ) 2 ] or [{Ru(η 5 ‐C 5 H 5 )(dppe)} 2 (μ‐N 2 )]OTf 2 with GeH 2 Ph 2 . In the dppe case, a σ‐germane complex is identified, which is proposed to undergo spontaneous elimination of H 2 : a key step in the double Ge─H bond activation, promoted by the sterically demanding half‐sandwich ruthenium complexes. This represents a distinct pathway for Ge─H bond activation when compared to the established routes, such as deprotonation by a basic hydrocarbyl ligand or oxidative addition, leading the way to new pathways to functionalize organogermanium compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carr‐Davis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: