Observational analysis shows high-dose estrogen affects fibroblast behavior in endometrial tissues, indicating potential for IUA therapy.
Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is the most common cause of uterine infertility in females, frequently recurs post-surgery due to limited treatment options. While estrogen is widely used to prevent recurrence, its efficacy is unclear. A key characteristic of intrauterine adhesion is the excessive production of extracellular matrix (ECM) by activated myofibroblasts, which disrupts normal endometrial mechanics. It remains unknown whether estrogen and ECM stiffness work synergistically in regulating transition of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts. We aim to uncover reasons for unsatisfactory efficacy of estrogen in preventing IUA. To address this, we cultured cells on substrates with different stiffness levels to mimic the mechanical properties of healthy and fibrotic endometrial tissues. We treated immortalized human endometrial stromal fibroblast cell lines, as well as fibroblasts isolated from normal and fibrotic tissues, with varying estrogen concentrations. Additionally, we used transforming growth factor-beta 1 to induce fibroblast activation, creating a cellular model of intrauterine adhesion. Our results show that high-dose estrogen promotes fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition in normal endometrial tissue but reverses this process in fibrotic tissue. Analysis of human endometrial stromal fibroblast cell lines and TGF-beta1-induced human endometrial stromal fibroblast cells further indicates high-dose estrogen inhibits myofibroblast activation. Notably, the opposing effects of estrogen on fibroblasts from normal versus fibrotic tissues are influenced by tissue stiffness. Furthermore, estrogen receptor alpha partially mediates the response of endometrial stromal cells to high-dose estrogen. These data suggest high-dose estrogen and ECM stiffness collaboratively regulate fibroblast phenotype. Targeting myofibroblasts with high-dose estrogen in adhesion region represents a promising antifibrotic strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: