Observational analysis identified significant pPGS-BMI interactions impacting liver biomarkers, suggesting better detection of gene-environment links.
Polygenic scores (PGS) are appealing for detecting gene-environment interactions, due to the aggregation of genetic effects and reduced multiple testing burden compared to single-variant genome-wide interaction studies (GWIS). However, standard PGS reflect many different biological mechanisms, limiting interpretation and potentially diluting pathway-specific interaction signals. Previous work has uncovered significant genome-wide PGS×Adiposity signal impacting liver function, but there is an opportunity for additional and more interpretable discoveries. Here, we leveraged pathway-specific polygenic scores (pPGS) to discover mechanism-specific gene-adiposity interactions. We tested for body mass index (BMI) interactions impacting three liver-related biomarkers (ALT, AST and GGT) using (1) a standard, genome-wide PGS, (2) an array of pPGS containing variant subsets derived from KEGG pathways, and (3) a GWIS. For ALT, we identified 49 significant pPGS×BMI interactions at a Bonferroni corrected p < 2.7×10-4, 80% of which were not explained by genes close to the 8 loci found in the associated GWIS. Across all biomarkers, we found interactions with 83 unique pPGS. We tested alternate pathway collections (Hallmark, KEGG Medicus), finding that the choice of pathway collection strongly impacts discovery. Our findings reinforced known biology (e.g., glycerolipid metabolism and hepatic lipid export affecting ALT release) and captured additional phenomena (e.g., actin cytoskeleton remodeling-associated variants alter the liver's robustness to lipid mechanical stress and thus GGT release). These results support the use of pPGS for well powered and interpretable discovery of pPGS×E interactions with adiposity-related exposures for liver biomarkers and motivate future studies using a broader collection of exposures and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westerman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: