This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The use of polygenic scores (PGS) for personalized medicine has gained momentum, along with caution to avoid accentuating health disparities. Greater ancestral diversity in genetic studies is needed, as well as close attention to the social determinants of health (SDoH).We measured the correlations between 3,030 PGS from the PGS Catalog and SDoH among participants in the Personalized Environment and Genes Study (PEGS). Correlations mainly ranged from -0.05 to 0.05, yet there was a heterogeneity of correlations across SDoH themes, with the largest amount of heterogeneity for PGS predicting body measures and smoking, as well as some common diseases. We also quantify the expected bias of PGS effect size on disease risk when strong predictors, such as SDoH, are omitted from models, emphasizing the importance of including SDoH with PGS to avoid biased estimates of PGS risk and to achieve equitable precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schaid et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: