Secondary analysis shows postnatal findings improve diagnostic yield in congenital anomalies, suggesting benefits of reanalysis.
Objective Analysis of exome sequencing (ES) relies on correlation with phenotypic features, but fetal phenotyping is often incomplete. The additional yield of postnatal follow‐up in cases with negative or inconclusive prenatal ES has not been demonstrated. Our objective was to assess the incremental diagnostic yield of ES reanalysis after initially negative prenatal ES for congenital anomalies incorporating features identified postnatally. Methods This was a secondary analysis of two prospective cohort studies of ES for fetal anomalies. We included cases in which initial ES utilizing the prenatal phenotype was not diagnostic. The primary outcome was incremental diagnostic yield of ES when incorporating postnatal findings. Results Eighty‐seven cases with negative or inconclusive prenatal ES and postnatal follow‐up available were included. Of those, 56 (64%) had new findings postnatally. There was an incremental yield of 2% in the entire cohort, and 7% in those with new postnatal findings. In two additional cases, postnatal evaluation suggested a specific genetic diagnosis that was not detectable with ES. Conclusion Among pregnancies with fetal anomalies and no clear diagnosis identified by prenatal ES, postnatal follow‐up is recommended. Reanalysis of ES results can result in a genetic diagnosis in 7% of cases with new findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swanson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: