Quantitative study assesses the influence of pre-simulation activities and simulation on paramedics' confidence and knowledge in pediatric emergencies, highlighting educational implications.
Pediatric emergencies require specialized prehospital care due to children's unique medical needs. This study explored the perceptions of a Middle Eastern Ambulance Service's paramedics regarding the impact of pediatric-related simulation-based activities on their knowledge and confidence. It also evaluated the influence of pre-simulation activities, including online materials, lectures, video-based learning, and skills workstations, on their preparedness for these simulations. This quantitative study involved 225 paramedics who participated in a 1-day pediatric Continuous Professional Development program conducted between January and March 2022. Following the program, participants completed an online post-program survey utilizing the Simulation Effectiveness Tool-Modified (SET-M). The SET-M results showed strong agreement (>90%) regarding the effectiveness of simulation in enhancing knowledge and confidence (M = 2.9, SD = 0.24-0.32). Participants also strongly agreed (>89.3) that pre-simulation activities improved their preparedness for simulation. Skills workstations received the highest ratings (M = 2.9, SD = 0.26), while video-based learning was slightly lower (M = 2.9, SD = 0.31). The breakdown analysis of two survey statements indicated that, regardless of experience, simulation exposure, or qualifications, participants positively perceived the effectiveness of both simulation scenarios and pre-simulation activities. The study highlights the paramedics' perceived positive impact of simulation on their knowledge and confidence in managing pediatric emergencies, emphasizing the value of pre-simulation activities in enhancing their preparedness for the simulation-based activity. The findings hold practical implications for educators, curriculum designers, and paramedic practitioners in improving pediatric emergency training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badawi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: