PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 18, 2025Journal of Marine Science and Engineering3 citationsOpen Access

An Integrated Delphi-AHP Study on the Systematic Improvement of Sea Anchors for Fishing Operations

View Full Paper
NKNamgu KIMYYYang YuYLYoo-Won LEE

Key Points

  • Prioritizing design improvements through expert consensus led to 15 key recommendations for sea anchors.
  • The highest-ranking factors include usability, durability, and fabric drying performance, based on expert input.
  • Using the Delphi method followed by AHP analysis ensured a systematic approach to identifying improvement areas.
  • The results provide a reliable foundation for evidence-based enhancements in sea anchor design and operation.

Abstract

Sea anchors for fishing operations are essential equipment to enhance catch efficiency and ensure operational stability at sea. However, previous studies have mainly focused on theoretical modeling or experiments under restricted conditions, which have not sufficiently reflected the complex operating environments and practical needs of real-world fisheries. To address this gap, this study derived key factors to improve the design and operation of sea anchors and quantitatively analyze the relative importance and rank of these factors. An expert panel was formed from 25 participants, including jigging vessel captains, recreational fishing boat captains, sea anchor manufacturers, and research institute workers. Using a three-round Delphi process followed by Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis, we distilled an initial list of 52 improvement suggestions into 15 prioritized items, quantitatively ranked by relative importance based on expert consensus. The highest-ranked factor was ‘Enhancement of fabric drying performance’, followed by ‘Application of low-cost, high-efficiency materials’, ‘Improvement of recovery’, ‘Enhancement of UV resistance’, and ‘Product quality certification’. The highest-weighted metric was ‘Improvement of usability’, followed by ‘Enhanced durability’ and ‘Improvement of functionality’. The consistency ratio (CR) of the pairwise-comparison matrix was 0.0014 (AHP acceptability criterion: CR ≤ 0.1), confirming the reliability and consistency of the analysis. By reflecting real-world priorities through a robust and systematic analytical process, this study offers a foundation for evidence-based improvements in sea anchor design and operation, overcoming the limitations of earlier approaches rooted in subjective judgment or trial-and-error experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

KIM et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46ccf31b076d99fa6929bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An assessment of the west winter–spring cohort of neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii) in the Northwest Pacific Ocean2008 · 56 citations
  2. 2A study on standardization through the analysis of the survey on the use of fishery sea anchor2022 · 3 citations
  3. 3Assessing the quality of expert judgment1994 · 168 citations
  4. 4Full Scale Test on the Parachute Type Sea Anchor1970 · 2 citations
  5. 5How To Make A Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process1988 · 569 citations