Case-crossover study links outdoor ultrafine particles with increased cardiovascular events, suggesting health risks.
Few epidemiological studies have examined the acute cardiovascular health impacts of within-city spatiotemporal variations in outdoor ultrafine particles (UFPs). We conducted a time-stratified case-crossover study of within-city spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs and emergency room visits for cardiovascular outcomes in Toronto, Canada, between 2019 and 2020. Outdoor UFP data (lag-0, 3-day mean, and 7-day mean) were assigned to residential locations using exposure models trained using data collected over a 1 year period (2020-2021). Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for outdoor UFP number concentrations (per 10,000/cm3) and mean UFP size (per 5 nm), adjusting for potential time-varying confounders. Effect modification by temperature was also examined. In total, our analysis included 89,694 cases of acute cardiovascular events. Seven-day mean outdoor UFP number concentrations and mean UFP size were most strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes. Specifically, 7-day mean outdoor UFP number concentrations were associated with increased risks of all cardiovascular events (OR = 1.058, 95% CI = 1.007, 1.111) and ischemic heart disease events (OR = 1.140, 95% CI = 1.020, 1.274). Likewise, 7-day mean outdoor UFP size was associated with increased risks of all cardiovascular events (OR = 1.026, 95% CI = 1.013, 1.039) and ischemic heart disease events (OR = 1.059, 95% CI = 1.029, 1.090). Submultiplicative and subadditive interactions were observed between temperature and both outdoor UFP number concentrations and mean UFP size. Within-city spatiotemporal variations in outdoor UFPs are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events independent of other common outdoor air pollutants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weichenthal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: