Survey analyzes how financial socialization and knowledge influence behavior in consumers using BNPL, indicating new strategies for service providers.
Purpose This study aims to examine how financial socialization (FS), financial behavior (FB) and buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) knowledge determine consumers’ attitude and behavioral intention (BI) toward the continuous usages of BNPL payment scheme (BNPLPS) employing family financial socialization theory (FFST). Design/methodology/approach The survey data were collected from 328 consumers who were using the BNPLPS to buy products and services. Variance-based structural equation modeling has been used to assess the research hypotheses. Findings The results reveal that consumers’ BNPL knowledge has emerged as the leading determinant of their attitude toward using BNPLPS, followed by FS and FB. Notably, consumers’ BI toward the continuous usage of BNPLPS is most significantly determined by BNPL knowledge, followed by their FB, attitude and FS. Results reveal the partial mediating role of consumers’ attitude between FFST elements, i.e. FS, FB and BNPL knowledge, and BI toward the continuous usages of BNPLPS. Notably, the partial mediating role of attitude between BNPL knowledge and BI was found to be most significant, and between FB and BI is least significant. Originality/value This is a pioneering study that has examined the determinants of consumers’ attitude and BI toward the sustained utilization of BNPLPS and validates the FFST elements, i.e. FS, FB and BNPL knowledge in the domain of BNPL as an emerging financial technology (Fintech) credit product. Besides, the present study offers several contributions to Fintech literature and also provides implications to BNPL service providers and BNPL regulators, which help them to understand what drives consumers’ attitude and BI toward continuous usage of BNPLPS and make appropriate strategies for encouraging and regulating the consumers to use BNPLPS effectively to manage financial requirements for buying products and services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: