Online experiment revealed that imprecise priors on somatic symptoms increase health anxiety, highlighting predictive processing's role.
Objective: In pathological health anxiety (pHA), a more liberal interoceptive response bias and health-threat related biases are observed. In predictive processing terms, this could be translated into a precise prior on high somatic symptom probability (symptom-prior) and an imprecise prior on one’s current (and future) health state (hidden-state-prior). Methods: In an online experiment, we used an adapted version of the Affect and Symptom Paradigm (ASP), previously shown to sufficiently elicit somatic symptoms. N =261 participants (Age: M =27.79, SD =9.61; Gender: 77.8% female, 21.5% male, 0.8% divers) were randomly assigned to four conditions, manipulating priors on somatic symptom probability (symptom-prior: precise and high probability vs. precise and low probability) and origins of somatic symptoms (hidden-state-prior: imprecise vs. precise and non-illness). Results: We did not observe any significant effects of symptom-prior manipulation on symptom report ( P =0.27). Inducing an imprecise prior on the origin of somatic symptoms (imprecise hidden-state-prior), though, was significantly associated with higher health anxiety after negative (compared to neutral) pictures in people with higher pre-existing health anxiety ( b =0.113, SE =0.045, 95% BCa CI [0.025, 0.201]). This effect was not attributable to a simultaneous change in valence or arousal ( p val =0.73; p aro =0.56). Conclusions: The findings suggest a possible central role of imprecise priors, especially on one’s health state, in pHA. Further evidence in clinical samples is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sauer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: