This innovative methodology integrates artificial intelligence and seismic data enhancement in coalbed methane exploration, highlighting significant accuracy improvements.
Exploration of coalbed methane (CBM) has long been plagued by critical technical challenges, including a low signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio in seismic data, difficulty identifying thin coal seams, and inadequate accuracy in interpreting complex structures. This study presents an innovative methodological framework that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) with advanced seismic processing and interpretation techniques. Its effectiveness is verified through a case study in the North Bowen Basin, Australia. A multi-scale seismic data enhancement approach combining dynamic balancing and blue filtering significantly improved data quality, increasing the S/N ratio by 53%. Using deep learning-driven, multi-attribute fusion analysis, we achieved a prediction error of less than ±1 m for the thickness of thin coal seams (4–7 m thick). Integrating 3D coherence and ant-tracking techniques improved the accuracy of fault identification, increasing the fault recognition rate by 30% and reducing the spatial localization error to below 3%. Additionally, a finely tuned, spatially variable velocity model limited the depth conversion error to 0.5%. Validation using horizontal well trajectories revealed that the rate of reservoir encounters exceeded 95%, with initial gas production in the predicted sweet spots zone being 25–30% higher than with traditional methods. Notably, this study established a quantitative model linking structural curvature to fracture intensity, providing a robust scientific basis for accurately predicting CBM sweet spots.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: