Literature is perhaps the best medium to vent out. The masterpieces under discussion have been juxtaposed to find out similarities and differences within. Astonishingly, both are quests aimed at the larger question in life, meaning of existence. However, they both approach this question differently. The study at hand tries to find out some of the similarities in the differences making it very viable for further investigation. Siddhartha, on one hand, is weary of the traditional belief system he has inherited and endeavors to unearth something more holistic. While Raskolnikov is bent on rebellion to the existing set of rules and laws. He tries to surpass them to justify his struggle. Fortunately, both men do experience what they set out for. However, the existential burden they carry is far too heavy. An implied connection to existentialism whether philosophical or Christian has been attempted – in the case of Siddhartha a primitive incompleteness and a modern disenchantment with over-completeness with respect to Raskolnikov. Thus, the representation of both the protagonists results in nonconformity. The study explores how both men overthrow what exists and consequently grapple with their own existence.
Mr. Waseem Uddin (Fri,) studied this question.