Analysis reveals the impact of crud on power distribution in pressurized-water reactors, suggesting improved reactor safety and performance.
This study develops a high-fidelity multiphysics coupling framework to systematically investigate the impact of Chalk River unidentified deposits (CRUD) on pressurized-water-reactor (PWR) assemblies, integrating neutronics, thermal hydraulics, and chemical kinetics modeling. CRUD, formed via subcooled nucleate boiling (SNB) and corrosion-product deposition, alters local boron concentrations, thereby inducing a power shift (CIPS) due to CRUD and generating asymmetric axial power distributions. The proposed framework adopts an internally coupled approach, utilizing Picard iteration and a background-mesh technique to resolve multiscale computational challenges while maintaining numerical accuracy and efficiency. Numerical simulations of a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mn>17</a:mn><a:mo>×</a:mo><a:mn>17</a:mn></a:math> PWR fuel assembly reveal that CRUD deposition reduces the eigenvalue by 293 percent mille (pcm) and shifts the axial power peak downward by 21 cm, corresponding to a 6.27% axial offset. Radially, the effect of CRUD on power distribution remains minimal (approximately 0.04%). A critical observation is the dominant influence of surface heat flux on CRUD growth, with thicker deposits and elevated boron concentrations observed in high-power regions. CRUD-induced perturbations also exhibit a “neighboring phenomenon,” wherein CRUD-free fuel rods experience comparable axial power shifts due to neutron-flux disturbances. These findings underscore the intricate coupling between power distribution, SNB, and CRUD chemistry, providing valuable insights for enhancing reactor performance and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: