PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 20, 2025Lara D. Veeken3 citationsOpen Access

Methyl-prednisolone plus methotrexate-based regime vs prednisone-based standard of care for giant cell arteritis: a propensity score study

View Full Paper
ASAdriana Soto-PeleteiroJHJosé Hernández‐RodríguezFRFátima Raad

Key Points

  • IVMP/methotrexate treatment achieves rapid remission without significant difference in relapse rates compared to standard care.
  • Patients on IVMP/methotrexate reached lower cumulative glucocorticoid doses faster, averaging 13.8 weeks compared to 56.5 weeks.
  • The study adjusted baseline differences using propensity scores, yielding comparable clinical characteristics between groups.
  • Patients receiving IVMP/methotrexate experienced significantly fewer glucocorticoid-related adverse effects, suggesting a safer option.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) still requires substantial exposure to glucocorticoids (GC), which are associated with significant toxicity. This study compares the efficacy and safety of the GC-only standard of care (SOC) with a regimen combining intravenous methyl-prednisolone (IVMP) pulses, methotrexate (MTX) and lower-doses of prednisone, in newly diagnosed patients with GCA. Methods A usual clinical practice study was conducted in three Spanish academic hospitals. 151 patients diagnosed with GCA were treated with SOC-prednisone (40–60 mg/d) or with IVMP (125–500 mg/d x3) followed by lower-dose prednisone (≤30 mg/d) and MTX (IVMP/MTX), with a follow-up of 2 years. A propensity score was used to adjust for baseline differences in the multivariate analyses. Results 79 (52.3%) patients received SOC-prednisone and 72 (47.7%) IVMP/MTX. The clinical characteristics at baseline were similar in both groups. 100% patients achieved remission after a median time of 4 weeks, without differences between groups. Relapse rates were also similar. Patients receiving IVMP/MTX had significantly lower cumulative GC doses and reached prednisone ≤5 mg/d faster than SOC patients (mean 13.8 vs 56.5 weeks; p 0.001). Patients in the IVMP/MTX group were less likely to suffer any GC-related adverse effect (adjusted OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.14–0.85; p= 0.021). Conclusions The combination IVMP/MTX with lower-dose prednisone is as effective as the SOC in inducing remission and preventing relapses in GCA. The IVMP/MTX scheme significantly reduces GC exposure and GC-associated adverse effects. IVMP/MTX could be a potential GC-sparing strategy, especially in patients with GCA at higher risk of GC toxicity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soto-Peleteiro et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d46fcd31b076d99fa69f55https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf499
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The use of intravenous methylprednisolone in giant cell arteritis: a population-based study2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2GIANT CELL ARTERITIS AND POLYMYALGIA RHEUMATICA1997 · 169 citations
  3. 32012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides2012 · 6,659 citations
  4. 4Azathioprine in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind study.1986 · 360 citations
  5. 5Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment2017 · 727 citations