Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory analysis reveals significant effects of 3D model size on haptic recognition accuracy among low-vision visitors, suggesting new design approaches.
Museums often present challenges for blind and low-vision visitors due to the emphasis on visual exploration. Using 3D-printed replicas enables haptic exploration of museum replicas and could enhance accessibility. Here, we investigated how the size of a 3D-printed replica affects the user’s haptic recognition accuracy. Twenty-eight sighted participants completed a touch-based recognition task using replicas of two Terracotta Warriors while being blindfolded. A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design was used to examine the effects of model type (kneeling/standing), size (large/small), and task order (first/second) on performance accuracy. ANOVA results revealed significant interactions between size and model type ( F (1, 48) = 7.82, p = .01, η 2 = .14), as well as between model type and task order ( F (1, 48) = 5.52, p = .02, η 2 = .10), but no other significant main effects or interactions. Post-hoc comparisons showed that small models significantly enhanced recognition only for the standing warrior, whose structures are simpler with features that are still accessible at a smaller scale. Additionally, prior exposure influenced subsequent performance differently across models. These findings offer insights into optimizing 3D-printed replicas for accessibility, highlighting the importance of considering both artifact characteristics and physical scaling when designing tactile replicas to enhance accessibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: